|
What
does Globalisation mean to the common person?
The introduction of New Economic
policies and Liberalisation of trade has opened the doors for disaster.
Agriculture is no exception to this. Today
the indigenous farmer stands insecure with the technological invasions of
the Multi Nationals Companies (MNC’s) directly affecting their lives. Unfortunately the policies are tuned to help the tormentor
rather than rescue the indigenous farmer.
The jargon used in globalisation
includes words such as Bio diversity, New economic policies, the GATT,
Markesh Agreement, the WTO and TRIPS. However, all these terms are Greek and
Latin to common people. When
understanding the terminology itself is difficult, it is hard to understand
the vital issues. Leave alone the masses of illiterate population in India;
even the educated are not fully familiar with the jargon and the issues
behind. Thus, in such a situation the question of their involvement in the
planning and decision making process is ruled out.
In particular, decisions made upon
crops seeds that Indian farmers have been using for centuries can have
detrimental impact on their livelihood. The vital issues concerning a crop
seed are; its reproducing capacity, its tolerance, its ability to generate
and the capacity to withstand pests. These concerns are now packed into
international policies and patent rights.
This could ultimately mean that the common medicinal plant growing in
our backyard which we are regularly using may be patented in other countries
(most probably the USA) and then they will have sole rights over its
properties and usage and we will have to pay money for that.
It appears that developing countries
are going to be the losers as our wealth of indigenous knowledge is held to
ransom by developed countries for commercial purposes. Natural conservation
used to be in the hands of the community. Now, with the onset of economic
liberalization, the government initiatives concerning land, water and
forests are designed to serve vested interests. The President of India’s
remark on the 50th anniversary of Indian Republic that the three
way fast lane, Liberalisation, Privatisation and Globalisation cannot be
placed above everything and cannot be an end in itself bears special
relevance.
The fact also remains that that
90’s have seen the fastest rate of economic growth since independence, but
large swathes of the country such as many states in the North and East have
been untouched by the reforms.
The Mystery of the Patent Act
unfolds…
Under the WTO one of the agreements
is the Amendment of the Patent Act. The
Patent Act that previously enacted in India ensured that the monopoly is
restricted and this act is not abused to the core by the vested interests
for the commercial purposes. The patents act of 1970 in India provided for
process patent and not product patents. So any company was free to
manufacture a drug by using a different process. A strip of Zintac for
instance is sold a t Rs.7.16 in India whereas in Pakistan, the US and the UK
the price is equivalent to Rs.122.16, Rs.739.60 and RS.320.85 though Glaxo
is the manufacturer in all the countries. But now this protection no longer
stays and with the amendment of the patent act we are at greater risk. From
2005 we will not be produce any drug, which is patented elsewhere by
replicating its development process.
The consequences will be disastrous
if drug prices rise especially because there is no social security system
present in India and other developing countries. Surely such global policies
will strike at the root by even denying them access to quality medicines…
(Banner: If it is not for commercial
exploitation of natures resources- Then why is there so much clamor for
Patents?)
Biopiracy: Patents on Traditional
Crop Seeds.
Patents have been secured for many
crop varieties by multinationals. Basmati rice, Neem, Tumeric, Black Pepper,
Karela (Bitter Gourd) and Brinjal (Egg
Plant) form the list that are of particular significance to Indian
farmers. In all cases it seems that certain qualities of crops and plants
and the process of extraction that have been known as indigenous practices
are patented by multinationals.
|
Crop
|
Properties
|
Who
holds the patent
|
Effects
|
Current Situation
|
|
Basmati
Rice
|
Popular
long grained, aromatic, non-sticky rice.
27
documented varieties in India developed over centuries by informal
breeding and indigenous innovation.
The name
‘Basmati’ is protected in the same way that Champagne can only be
produced in that specific region of France.
India is
the world’s second largest producer. Grows 650,000 tns, of this
400,000 tns is exported.
|
RiceTec
Inc. (US)
Claims
to have engineered a new variety called ‘Texmati’.
|
The
patent protects certain varieties of Basmati that the Indian farmers
have been breeding for centuries.
These
varieties can no longer be sold as Basmati unless farmers pay RiceTec
Inc. royalties.
Potential
loss in exports will have a severe impact on farmer’s livelihoods
and ultimately the Indian economy.
|
Patent Holds
Farmers
have been outraged and protested.
BUT
Patent still holds.
|
|
Neem
|
Has uses
in Medicine, fuel and agriculture.
Anti-fungal
properties have been known for centuries
|
WR Grace
Co (US)
Has
patenting rights on the process of Pesticide extraction from the tree.
|
Process
has been known and practices by Indians for many years.
Decades
of scientific research robbed from Indian people.
|
Patent Rejected
Rejected after a legal wrangle with
the US
Techniques were well known to
farmers, thus could not be patented.
|
|
Tumeric
|
Used in
cooking and for medicinal purposes
|
US
Multinational
Was
granted patent rights over all turmeric-based medicines.
|
India
has made use of the medicinal qualities of turmeric for centuries.
|
Patent Revoked
Use of
turmeric for medicinal purposed not novel.
|
|
Karela (Bitter Gourd)
Brinjal (Egg Plant)
|
Anti-diabetic
properties
|
Patent
for anti-diabetic application granted to US New Jersey Scientist
|
Common
everyday knowledge in India.
Use in
diabetes well documented in authoritative treaties.
|
Patent Stands
Patent can be revoked but is an
expensive and time consuming process
|
(Banners: INDUSTIALISED COUNTRIES HOLD 97
PERCENT OF ALL PATENTS
Eighty percent of patents granted in
developing countries are with residents of industrial countries
GLOBALISATION HAS WORKED FOR PROFITS
NOT PEOPLE ACCORDING TO UNDP’S HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT)
Terminator Seeds
Farmers traditionally store the
seeds for the next crop. Billions of farmers depend upon saving seed to feed
their families and maintain a livelihood. But now with the research on new
seed variants the farmer will no longer be able to replicate his own seeds.
Now extreme greed and
commercialisation is leading to more devastation.
Terminator technology means that the seeds
produced by the plant will be infertile and therefore not re-germinate.
This will force the farmers to buy seed from the same company.
The effects of this technology will be devastating for farmers in the
developing world.
There is also a danger that
terminator crops will affect non-terminator crops grown close by. Pollen
from crops with infertile seeds can spread over a large area and would make
other seeds infertile. This
could ruin the prospects and livelihoods of many people.
Genetic engineering is resulting in
seeds (albeit in conceptual stage) in which important traits can be switched
on or off with the use of certain fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides.
The result of such research is that seeds will turn fertile only with the
application of certain fertilizers or will be protected only if they are
treated with particular pesticides. If
such seeds come to market the dependence of the farmer on firms that market
their unique range of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides will be
complete.
A permanent solution requires the
governments of the world to foreswear that they will prohibit the cynical
manipulation of seed technology for commercial interests.
The attempted control over the farmers is resented.
Colonialism Returns
It appears that a new wave of
Northern colonialism is occurring as a increasing amount of genetic material
is being taken from less developed countries in order to line the pockets of
western multinationals.
Further just like selling the
cheap commodities at throw away prices, the patents on the indigenous
knowledge are being granted in the US.
The developing countries like India have to spend enormous amount of
their time, energy and resources in fighting lengthy legal battles.
It also needs to document all the evidences of its existence since
thousands of years. It is not
enough to just win the battles. The
countries should be subjected to severe strictures and should be taken to
appropriate task for having granted patents without looking into the
historical evidences. Otherwise
it will once again become an exercise where the rich countries will keep on
issuing patents on every flimsy reason and the developing countries have to
unnecessarily harness their resources to fight unwarranted battles.
This trend is likely to continue
until India develops legislation to protect the country’s natural
resources and stop them from flowing out of India.
If this trend continues the livelihoods of millions of farmers in
India and other developing countries will be destroyed and food security of
nations will be severely damaged.
|